← Back to Charlo snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Charlo vs Condon, MT

Charlo currently scores 1 points higher overall than Condon, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Charlo

26/100

Open city page →

Condon

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Charlo: 26/100 · Condon: 25/100

Charlo is 1 points higher.

Flood

Charlo: 38/100 · Condon: 28/100

Charlo is 10 points higher.

Charlo: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Condon: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Charlo: 14/100 · Condon: 14/100

No gap.

Charlo: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Condon: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Charlo: 16/100 · Condon: 22/100

Condon is 6 points higher.

Charlo: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Condon: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Charlo: 0/100 · Condon: 4/100

Condon is 4 points higher.

Charlo: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Condon: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Charlo: 24/100 · Condon: 7/100

Charlo is 17 points higher.

Charlo: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Condon: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Charlo: Unavailable · Condon: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Charlo: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Condon: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Charlo: 53/100 · Condon: 89/100

Condon is 36 points higher.

Charlo: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Condon: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Charlo: 12/100 · Condon: 12/100

No gap.

Charlo: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Condon: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.