City vs city

Running Water vs Tabor, SD

Running Water currently scores 7 points higher overall than Tabor, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Running Water

40/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Running Water: 40/100 · Tabor: 33/100

Running Water is 7 points higher.

Flood

Running Water: 81/100 · Tabor: 13/100

Running Water is 68 points higher.

Running Water: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Tabor: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Running Water: 21/100 · Tabor: 21/100

No gap.

Running Water: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Tabor: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Running Water: 32/100 · Tabor: 30/100

Running Water is 2 points higher.

Running Water: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tabor: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Running Water: 8/100 · Tabor: 15/100

Tabor is 7 points higher.

Running Water: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tabor: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Running Water: 50/100 · Tabor: 75/100

Tabor is 25 points higher.

Running Water: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tabor: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Running Water: Unavailable · Tabor: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Running Water: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Tabor: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Running Water: 50/100 · Tabor: 41/100

Running Water is 9 points higher.

Running Water: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Tabor: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Running Water: Unavailable · Tabor: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Running Water: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Tabor: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.