City vs city
Mitchell vs Running Water, SD
Mitchell currently scores 14 points higher overall than Running Water, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Mitchell: 54/100 · Running Water: 40/100
Mitchell is 14 points higher.
Flood
Mitchell: 68/100 · Running Water: 81/100
Running Water is 13 points higher.
Mitchell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Running Water: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Mitchell: 21/100 · Running Water: 21/100
No gap.
Mitchell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Running Water: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Mitchell: 52/100 · Running Water: 32/100
Mitchell is 20 points higher.
Mitchell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Running Water: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Mitchell: 38/100 · Running Water: 8/100
Mitchell is 30 points higher.
Mitchell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Running Water: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Mitchell: 100/100 · Running Water: 50/100
Mitchell is 50 points higher.
Mitchell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Running Water: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Mitchell: Unavailable · Running Water: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Mitchell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Running Water: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Mitchell: 43/100 · Running Water: 50/100
Running Water is 7 points higher.
Mitchell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Running Water: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Mitchell: Unavailable · Running Water: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Mitchell: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Running Water: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.