← Back to Mitchell snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Mitchell vs Yankton, SD

Mitchell currently scores 6 points higher overall than Yankton, with the largest gap in lightning.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Mitchell

54/100

Open city page →

Yankton

48/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Mitchell: 54/100 · Yankton: 48/100

Mitchell is 6 points higher.

Flood

Mitchell: 68/100 · Yankton: 50/100

Mitchell is 18 points higher.

Mitchell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.

Yankton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 13 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Mitchell: 21/100 · Yankton: 21/100

No gap.

Mitchell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Yankton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Mitchell: 52/100 · Yankton: 32/100

Mitchell is 20 points higher.

Mitchell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Yankton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Mitchell: 38/100 · Yankton: 31/100

Mitchell is 7 points higher.

Mitchell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Yankton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Mitchell: 100/100 · Yankton: 100/100

No gap.

Mitchell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Yankton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Mitchell: Unavailable · Yankton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Mitchell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Yankton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Mitchell: 43/100 · Yankton: 54/100

Yankton is 11 points higher.

Mitchell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Yankton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Mitchell: Unavailable · Yankton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Mitchell: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Yankton: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.