City vs city
Dante vs Mitchell, SD
Mitchell currently scores 10 points higher overall than Dante, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Dante: 44/100 · Mitchell: 54/100
Mitchell is 10 points higher.
Flood
Dante: 40/100 · Mitchell: 68/100
Mitchell is 28 points higher.
Dante: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Mitchell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Dante: 21/100 · Mitchell: 21/100
No gap.
Dante: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Mitchell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Dante: 32/100 · Mitchell: 52/100
Mitchell is 20 points higher.
Dante: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Mitchell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Dante: 15/100 · Mitchell: 38/100
Mitchell is 23 points higher.
Dante: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Mitchell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Dante: 100/100 · Mitchell: 100/100
No gap.
Dante: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Mitchell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Dante: Unavailable · Mitchell: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Dante: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Mitchell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Dante: 54/100 · Mitchell: 43/100
Dante is 11 points higher.
Dante: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Mitchell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Dante: Unavailable · Mitchell: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Dante: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Mitchell: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.