City vs city
Brookings vs Dante, SD
Brookings currently scores 5 points higher overall than Dante, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Brookings: 49/100 · Dante: 44/100
Brookings is 5 points higher.
Flood
Brookings: 85/100 · Dante: 40/100
Brookings is 45 points higher.
Brookings: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 15 features intersect this tile.
Dante: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Brookings: 20/100 · Dante: 21/100
Dante is 1 points higher.
Brookings: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Dante: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Brookings: 66/100 · Dante: 32/100
Brookings is 34 points higher.
Brookings: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Dante: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Brookings: 19/100 · Dante: 15/100
Brookings is 4 points higher.
Brookings: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Dante: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Brookings: 91/100 · Dante: 100/100
Dante is 9 points higher.
Brookings: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Dante: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Brookings: Unavailable · Dante: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Brookings: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Dante: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Brookings: 45/100 · Dante: 54/100
Dante is 9 points higher.
Brookings: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Dante: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Brookings: 19/100 · Dante: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Brookings: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Dante: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.