← Back to Martin snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Martin vs Sutherland, NE

Martin currently scores 1 points higher overall than Sutherland, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Martin

55/100

Open city page →

Sutherland

54/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Martin: 55/100 · Sutherland: 54/100

Martin is 1 points higher.

Flood

Martin: 80/100 · Sutherland: 71/100

Martin is 9 points higher.

Martin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Sutherland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Martin: 19/100 · Sutherland: 20/100

Sutherland is 1 points higher.

Martin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Sutherland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Martin: 72/100 · Sutherland: 65/100

Martin is 7 points higher.

Martin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Sutherland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Martin: 46/100 · Sutherland: 23/100

Martin is 23 points higher.

Martin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Sutherland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Martin: 100/100 · Sutherland: 100/100

No gap.

Martin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Sutherland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Martin: Unavailable · Sutherland: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Martin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Sutherland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Martin: 12/100 · Sutherland: 43/100

Sutherland is 31 points higher.

Martin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Sutherland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Martin: Unavailable · Sutherland: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Martin: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Sutherland: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.