← Back to Kearney snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Kearney vs Martin, NE

Martin currently scores 2 points higher overall than Kearney, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Kearney

53/100

Open city page →

Martin

55/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Kearney: 53/100 · Martin: 55/100

Martin is 2 points higher.

Flood

Kearney: 41/100 · Martin: 80/100

Martin is 39 points higher.

Kearney: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Martin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Kearney: 19/100 · Martin: 19/100

No gap.

Kearney: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Martin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Kearney: 38/100 · Martin: 72/100

Martin is 34 points higher.

Kearney: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Martin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Kearney: 73/100 · Martin: 46/100

Kearney is 27 points higher.

Kearney: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Martin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Kearney: 100/100 · Martin: 100/100

No gap.

Kearney: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Martin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Kearney: Unavailable · Martin: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kearney: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Martin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Kearney: 48/100 · Martin: 12/100

Kearney is 36 points higher.

Kearney: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Martin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Kearney: Unavailable · Martin: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kearney: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Martin: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.