← Back to Martin snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Martin vs Paxton, NE

Martin currently scores 1 points higher overall than Paxton, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Martin

55/100

Open city page →

Paxton

54/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Martin: 55/100 · Paxton: 54/100

Martin is 1 points higher.

Flood

Martin: 80/100 · Paxton: 57/100

Martin is 23 points higher.

Martin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Paxton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Martin: 19/100 · Paxton: 19/100

No gap.

Martin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Paxton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Martin: 72/100 · Paxton: 68/100

Martin is 4 points higher.

Martin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Paxton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Martin: 46/100 · Paxton: 27/100

Martin is 19 points higher.

Martin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Paxton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Martin: 100/100 · Paxton: 100/100

No gap.

Martin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Paxton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Martin: Unavailable · Paxton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Martin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Paxton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Martin: 12/100 · Paxton: 54/100

Paxton is 42 points higher.

Martin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Paxton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Martin: Unavailable · Paxton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Martin: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Paxton: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.