← Back to Gardner snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Gardner vs Hunter, ND

Gardner currently scores 2 points higher overall than Hunter, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Gardner

32/100

Open city page →

Hunter

30/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Gardner: 32/100 · Hunter: 30/100

Gardner is 2 points higher.

Flood

Gardner: 41/100 · Hunter: 23/100

Gardner is 18 points higher.

Gardner: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 15 features intersect this tile.

Hunter: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Gardner: 19/100 · Hunter: 19/100

No gap.

Gardner: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Hunter: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Gardner: 27/100 · Hunter: 26/100

Gardner is 1 points higher.

Gardner: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Hunter: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Gardner: 19/100 · Hunter: 23/100

Hunter is 4 points higher.

Gardner: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hunter: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Gardner: 52/100 · Hunter: 49/100

Gardner is 3 points higher.

Gardner: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hunter: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Gardner: Unavailable · Hunter: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Gardner: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Hunter: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Gardner: 28/100 · Hunter: 32/100

Hunter is 4 points higher.

Gardner: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Hunter: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Gardner: 37/100 · Hunter: 37/100

No gap.

Gardner: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Hunter: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.