City vs city
Kings Grant vs Wrightsboro, NC
Wrightsboro currently scores 7 points higher overall than Kings Grant, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Kings Grant: 56/100 · Wrightsboro: 63/100
Wrightsboro is 7 points higher.
Flood
Kings Grant: 41/100 · Wrightsboro: 66/100
Wrightsboro is 25 points higher.
Kings Grant: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wrightsboro: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Kings Grant: 50/100 · Wrightsboro: 49/100
Kings Grant is 1 points higher.
Kings Grant: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Wrightsboro: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Kings Grant: 45/100 · Wrightsboro: 47/100
Wrightsboro is 2 points higher.
Kings Grant: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Wrightsboro: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Kings Grant: 46/100 · Wrightsboro: 65/100
Wrightsboro is 19 points higher.
Kings Grant: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Wrightsboro: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Kings Grant: 100/100 · Wrightsboro: 100/100
No gap.
Kings Grant: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Wrightsboro: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Kings Grant: 96/100 · Wrightsboro: 95/100
Kings Grant is 1 points higher.
Kings Grant: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wrightsboro: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Kings Grant: 54/100 · Wrightsboro: 66/100
Wrightsboro is 12 points higher.
Kings Grant: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Wrightsboro: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Kings Grant: 18/100 · Wrightsboro: 18/100
No gap.
Kings Grant: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Wrightsboro: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.