City vs city
Greensboro vs Kings Grant, NC
Kings Grant currently scores 18 points higher overall than Greensboro, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Greensboro: 38/100 · Kings Grant: 56/100
Kings Grant is 18 points higher.
Flood
Greensboro: 43/100 · Kings Grant: 41/100
Greensboro is 2 points higher.
Greensboro: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Kings Grant: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Greensboro: 19/100 · Kings Grant: 50/100
Kings Grant is 31 points higher.
Greensboro: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Kings Grant: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Greensboro: 42/100 · Kings Grant: 45/100
Kings Grant is 3 points higher.
Greensboro: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Kings Grant: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Greensboro: 15/100 · Kings Grant: 46/100
Kings Grant is 31 points higher.
Greensboro: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kings Grant: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Greensboro: 64/100 · Kings Grant: 100/100
Kings Grant is 36 points higher.
Greensboro: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kings Grant: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Greensboro: Unavailable · Kings Grant: 96/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Greensboro: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Kings Grant: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Greensboro: 49/100 · Kings Grant: 54/100
Kings Grant is 5 points higher.
Greensboro: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Kings Grant: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Greensboro: 35/100 · Kings Grant: 18/100
Greensboro is 17 points higher.
Greensboro: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Kings Grant: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.