← Back to Clinton snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Clinton vs Erwin, NC

Erwin currently scores 4 points higher overall than Clinton, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Clinton

42/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Clinton: 42/100 · Erwin: 46/100

Erwin is 4 points higher.

Flood

Clinton: 36/100 · Erwin: 39/100

Erwin is 3 points higher.

Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Erwin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Clinton: 32/100 · Erwin: 26/100

Clinton is 6 points higher.

Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Erwin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Clinton: 61/100 · Erwin: 62/100

Erwin is 1 points higher.

Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Erwin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Clinton: 8/100 · Erwin: 15/100

Erwin is 7 points higher.

Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Erwin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Clinton: 64/100 · Erwin: 77/100

Erwin is 13 points higher.

Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Erwin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Clinton: Unavailable · Erwin: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Erwin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Clinton: 65/100 · Erwin: 73/100

Erwin is 8 points higher.

Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Erwin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Clinton: 29/100 · Erwin: 30/100

Erwin is 1 points higher.

Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Erwin: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.