City vs city
Clinton vs Greensboro, NC
Clinton currently scores 4 points higher overall than Greensboro, with the largest gap in lightning.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 42/100 · Greensboro: 38/100
Clinton is 4 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: 36/100 · Greensboro: 43/100
Greensboro is 7 points higher.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Greensboro: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clinton: 32/100 · Greensboro: 19/100
Clinton is 13 points higher.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 61/100 · Greensboro: 42/100
Clinton is 19 points higher.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 8/100 · Greensboro: 15/100
Greensboro is 7 points higher.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 64/100 · Greensboro: 64/100
No gap.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Greensboro: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Greensboro: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clinton: 65/100 · Greensboro: 49/100
Clinton is 16 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Greensboro: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clinton: 29/100 · Greensboro: 35/100
Greensboro is 6 points higher.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Greensboro: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.