City vs city
Rolling Fork vs Southaven, MS
Rolling Fork currently scores 13 points higher overall than Southaven, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Rolling Fork: 45/100 · Southaven: 32/100
Rolling Fork is 13 points higher.
Flood
Rolling Fork: 88/100 · Southaven: 0/100
Rolling Fork is 88 points higher.
Rolling Fork: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Southaven: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Rolling Fork: 15/100 · Southaven: 14/100
Rolling Fork is 1 points higher.
Rolling Fork: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Southaven: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Rolling Fork: 70/100 · Southaven: 63/100
Rolling Fork is 7 points higher.
Rolling Fork: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Southaven: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Rolling Fork: 50/100 · Southaven: 0/100
Rolling Fork is 50 points higher.
Rolling Fork: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Southaven: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Rolling Fork: 41/100 · Southaven: 45/100
Southaven is 4 points higher.
Rolling Fork: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Southaven: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Rolling Fork: Unavailable · Southaven: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Rolling Fork: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Southaven: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Rolling Fork: 28/100 · Southaven: 48/100
Southaven is 20 points higher.
Rolling Fork: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Southaven: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Rolling Fork: 23/100 · Southaven: 23/100
No gap.
Rolling Fork: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Southaven: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.