City vs city

Hattiesburg vs Rolling Fork, MS

Hattiesburg currently scores 9 points higher overall than Rolling Fork, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hattiesburg

54/100

Open city page →

Rolling Fork

45/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Hattiesburg: 54/100 · Rolling Fork: 45/100

Hattiesburg is 9 points higher.

Flood

Hattiesburg: 46/100 · Rolling Fork: 88/100

Rolling Fork is 42 points higher.

Hattiesburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Rolling Fork: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Hattiesburg: 37/100 · Rolling Fork: 15/100

Hattiesburg is 22 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Rolling Fork: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Hattiesburg: 92/100 · Rolling Fork: 70/100

Hattiesburg is 22 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Rolling Fork: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Hattiesburg: 73/100 · Rolling Fork: 50/100

Hattiesburg is 23 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Fork: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Hattiesburg: 36/100 · Rolling Fork: 41/100

Rolling Fork is 5 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Fork: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Hattiesburg: Unavailable · Rolling Fork: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Hattiesburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Rolling Fork: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Hattiesburg: 69/100 · Rolling Fork: 28/100

Hattiesburg is 41 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Rolling Fork: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Hattiesburg: 22/100 · Rolling Fork: 23/100

Rolling Fork is 1 points higher.

Hattiesburg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Rolling Fork: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.