City vs city
Durant vs Goodman, MS
Durant currently scores 8 points higher overall than Goodman, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Durant: 45/100 · Goodman: 37/100
Durant is 8 points higher.
Flood
Durant: 59/100 · Goodman: 55/100
Durant is 4 points higher.
Durant: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Goodman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Durant: 17/100 · Goodman: 17/100
No gap.
Durant: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Goodman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Durant: 71/100 · Goodman: 70/100
Durant is 1 points higher.
Durant: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Goodman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Durant: 50/100 · Goodman: 23/100
Durant is 27 points higher.
Durant: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Goodman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Durant: 39/100 · Goodman: 11/100
Durant is 28 points higher.
Durant: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Goodman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Durant: Unavailable · Goodman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Durant: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Goodman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Durant: 55/100 · Goodman: 61/100
Goodman is 6 points higher.
Durant: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Goodman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Durant: 23/100 · Goodman: 23/100
No gap.
Durant: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Goodman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.