City vs city
Durant vs Hattiesburg, MS
Hattiesburg currently scores 9 points higher overall than Durant, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Durant: 45/100 · Hattiesburg: 54/100
Hattiesburg is 9 points higher.
Flood
Durant: 59/100 · Hattiesburg: 46/100
Durant is 13 points higher.
Durant: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Hattiesburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Durant: 17/100 · Hattiesburg: 37/100
Hattiesburg is 20 points higher.
Durant: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hattiesburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Durant: 71/100 · Hattiesburg: 92/100
Hattiesburg is 21 points higher.
Durant: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hattiesburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Durant: 50/100 · Hattiesburg: 73/100
Hattiesburg is 23 points higher.
Durant: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hattiesburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Durant: 39/100 · Hattiesburg: 36/100
Durant is 3 points higher.
Durant: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hattiesburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Durant: Unavailable · Hattiesburg: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Durant: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hattiesburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Durant: 55/100 · Hattiesburg: 69/100
Hattiesburg is 14 points higher.
Durant: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hattiesburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Durant: 23/100 · Hattiesburg: 22/100
Durant is 1 points higher.
Durant: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hattiesburg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.