City vs city
Como vs Falcon, MS
Falcon currently scores 4 points higher overall than Como, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Como: 34/100 · Falcon: 38/100
Falcon is 4 points higher.
Flood
Como: 36/100 · Falcon: 96/100
Falcon is 60 points higher.
Como: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Falcon: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Como: 14/100 · Falcon: 14/100
No gap.
Como: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Falcon: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Como: 67/100 · Falcon: 64/100
Como is 3 points higher.
Como: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Falcon: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Como: 0/100 · Falcon: 4/100
Falcon is 4 points higher.
Como: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Falcon: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Como: 13/100 · Falcon: 9/100
Como is 4 points higher.
Como: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Falcon: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Como: Unavailable · Falcon: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Como: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Falcon: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Como: 54/100 · Falcon: 53/100
Como is 1 points higher.
Como: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Falcon: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Como: 21/100 · Falcon: 23/100
Falcon is 2 points higher.
Como: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Falcon: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.