City vs city
Como vs Southaven, MS
Como currently scores 2 points higher overall than Southaven, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Como: 34/100 · Southaven: 32/100
Como is 2 points higher.
Flood
Como: 36/100 · Southaven: 0/100
Como is 36 points higher.
Como: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Southaven: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Como: 14/100 · Southaven: 14/100
No gap.
Como: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Southaven: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Como: 67/100 · Southaven: 63/100
Como is 4 points higher.
Como: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Southaven: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Como: 0/100 · Southaven: 0/100
No gap.
Como: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Southaven: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Como: 13/100 · Southaven: 45/100
Southaven is 32 points higher.
Como: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Southaven: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Como: Unavailable · Southaven: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Como: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Southaven: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Como: 54/100 · Southaven: 48/100
Como is 6 points higher.
Como: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Southaven: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Como: 21/100 · Southaven: 23/100
Southaven is 2 points higher.
Como: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Southaven: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city