City vs city
Ackerman vs Maben, MS
Maben currently scores 1 points higher overall than Ackerman, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Ackerman: 42/100 · Maben: 43/100
Maben is 1 points higher.
Flood
Ackerman: 30/100 · Maben: 31/100
Maben is 1 points higher.
Ackerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Maben: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Ackerman: 17/100 · Maben: 16/100
Ackerman is 1 points higher.
Ackerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Maben: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Ackerman: 72/100 · Maben: 76/100
Maben is 4 points higher.
Ackerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Maben: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Ackerman: 8/100 · Maben: 0/100
Ackerman is 8 points higher.
Ackerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Maben: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Ackerman: 71/100 · Maben: 48/100
Ackerman is 23 points higher.
Ackerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Maben: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Ackerman: Unavailable · Maben: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Ackerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Maben: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Ackerman: 66/100 · Maben: 61/100
Ackerman is 5 points higher.
Ackerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Maben: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Ackerman: 27/100 · Maben: 27/100
No gap.
Ackerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Maben: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.