City vs city
Ackerman vs Biloxi, MS
Biloxi currently scores 7 points higher overall than Ackerman, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Ackerman: 42/100 · Biloxi: 49/100
Biloxi is 7 points higher.
Flood
Ackerman: 30/100 · Biloxi: 58/100
Biloxi is 28 points higher.
Ackerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Biloxi: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Ackerman: 17/100 · Biloxi: 64/100
Biloxi is 47 points higher.
Ackerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Biloxi: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Ackerman: 72/100 · Biloxi: 86/100
Biloxi is 14 points higher.
Ackerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Biloxi: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Ackerman: 8/100 · Biloxi: 27/100
Biloxi is 19 points higher.
Ackerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Biloxi: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Ackerman: 71/100 · Biloxi: 31/100
Ackerman is 40 points higher.
Ackerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Biloxi: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Ackerman: Unavailable · Biloxi: 99/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Ackerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Biloxi: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Ackerman: 66/100 · Biloxi: 8/100
Ackerman is 58 points higher.
Ackerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Biloxi: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Ackerman: 27/100 · Biloxi: 18/100
Ackerman is 9 points higher.
Ackerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Biloxi: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.