City vs city
Ackerman vs Louisville, MS
Louisville currently scores 5 points higher overall than Ackerman, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Ackerman: 42/100 · Louisville: 47/100
Louisville is 5 points higher.
Flood
Ackerman: 30/100 · Louisville: 37/100
Louisville is 7 points higher.
Ackerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Louisville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Ackerman: 17/100 · Louisville: 17/100
No gap.
Ackerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Louisville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Ackerman: 72/100 · Louisville: 67/100
Ackerman is 5 points higher.
Ackerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Louisville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Ackerman: 8/100 · Louisville: 38/100
Louisville is 30 points higher.
Ackerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Louisville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Ackerman: 71/100 · Louisville: 93/100
Louisville is 22 points higher.
Ackerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Louisville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Ackerman: Unavailable · Louisville: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Ackerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Louisville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Ackerman: 66/100 · Louisville: 51/100
Ackerman is 15 points higher.
Ackerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Louisville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Ackerman: 27/100 · Louisville: 28/100
Louisville is 1 points higher.
Ackerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Louisville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.