City vs city
Cearfoss vs Columbia, MD
Cearfoss currently scores 4 points higher overall than Columbia, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cearfoss: 39/100 · Columbia: 35/100
Cearfoss is 4 points higher.
Flood
Cearfoss: 22/100 · Columbia: 24/100
Columbia is 2 points higher.
Cearfoss: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Columbia: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cearfoss: 20/100 · Columbia: 21/100
Columbia is 1 points higher.
Cearfoss: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Columbia: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cearfoss: 19/100 · Columbia: 39/100
Columbia is 20 points higher.
Cearfoss: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Columbia: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cearfoss: 19/100 · Columbia: 19/100
No gap.
Cearfoss: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Columbia: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cearfoss: 100/100 · Columbia: 58/100
Cearfoss is 42 points higher.
Cearfoss: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Columbia: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cearfoss: Unavailable · Columbia: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cearfoss: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Columbia: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cearfoss: 53/100 · Columbia: 40/100
Cearfoss is 13 points higher.
Cearfoss: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Columbia: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cearfoss: 42/100 · Columbia: 42/100
No gap.
Cearfoss: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Columbia: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.