← Back to Baltimore snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Baltimore vs Cearfoss, MD

Baltimore currently scores 3 points higher overall than Cearfoss, with the largest gap in lightning.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Baltimore

42/100

Open city page →

Cearfoss

39/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Baltimore: 42/100 · Cearfoss: 39/100

Baltimore is 3 points higher.

Flood

Baltimore: 27/100 · Cearfoss: 22/100

Baltimore is 5 points higher.

Baltimore: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 15 features intersect this tile.

Cearfoss: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Baltimore: 21/100 · Cearfoss: 20/100

Baltimore is 1 points higher.

Baltimore: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Cearfoss: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Baltimore: 40/100 · Cearfoss: 19/100

Baltimore is 21 points higher.

Baltimore: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Cearfoss: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Baltimore: 35/100 · Cearfoss: 19/100

Baltimore is 16 points higher.

Baltimore: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Cearfoss: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Baltimore: 89/100 · Cearfoss: 100/100

Cearfoss is 11 points higher.

Baltimore: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Cearfoss: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Baltimore: 47/100 · Cearfoss: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Baltimore: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Cearfoss: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Baltimore: 34/100 · Cearfoss: 53/100

Cearfoss is 19 points higher.

Baltimore: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Cearfoss: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Baltimore: 43/100 · Cearfoss: 42/100

Baltimore is 1 points higher.

Baltimore: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Cearfoss: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.