City vs city
Bivalve vs Cambridge, MD
Bivalve currently scores 3 points higher overall than Cambridge, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Bivalve: 38/100 · Cambridge: 35/100
Bivalve is 3 points higher.
Flood
Bivalve: 54/100 · Cambridge: 30/100
Bivalve is 24 points higher.
Bivalve: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 15 features intersect this tile.
Cambridge: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Bivalve: 25/100 · Cambridge: 23/100
Bivalve is 2 points higher.
Bivalve: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Cambridge: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Bivalve: 24/100 · Cambridge: 25/100
Cambridge is 1 points higher.
Bivalve: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Cambridge: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Bivalve: 4/100 · Cambridge: 8/100
Cambridge is 4 points higher.
Bivalve: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Cambridge: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Bivalve: 5/100 · Cambridge: 26/100
Cambridge is 21 points higher.
Bivalve: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Cambridge: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Bivalve: 88/100 · Cambridge: 87/100
Bivalve is 1 points higher.
Bivalve: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Cambridge: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Bivalve: 69/100 · Cambridge: 39/100
Bivalve is 30 points higher.
Bivalve: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Cambridge: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Bivalve: 31/100 · Cambridge: 40/100
Cambridge is 9 points higher.
Bivalve: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Cambridge: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.