← Back to Ashton snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Ashton vs Bivalve, MD

Bivalve currently scores 4 points higher overall than Ashton, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Ashton

34/100

Open city page →

Bivalve

38/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Ashton: 34/100 · Bivalve: 38/100

Bivalve is 4 points higher.

Flood

Ashton: 24/100 · Bivalve: 54/100

Bivalve is 30 points higher.

Ashton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Bivalve: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 15 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Ashton: 21/100 · Bivalve: 25/100

Bivalve is 4 points higher.

Ashton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Bivalve: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Ashton: 37/100 · Bivalve: 24/100

Ashton is 13 points higher.

Ashton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Bivalve: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Ashton: 12/100 · Bivalve: 4/100

Ashton is 8 points higher.

Ashton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Bivalve: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Ashton: 63/100 · Bivalve: 5/100

Ashton is 58 points higher.

Ashton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Bivalve: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Ashton: Unavailable · Bivalve: 88/100

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Ashton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Bivalve: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Ashton: 40/100 · Bivalve: 69/100

Bivalve is 29 points higher.

Ashton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Bivalve: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Ashton: 43/100 · Bivalve: 31/100

Ashton is 12 points higher.

Ashton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Bivalve: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.