City vs city
Heber-Overgaard vs Taylor, AZ
Heber-Overgaard currently scores 5 points higher overall than Taylor, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Heber-Overgaard: 33/100 · Taylor: 28/100
Heber-Overgaard is 5 points higher.
Flood
Heber-Overgaard: 38/100 · Taylor: 47/100
Taylor is 9 points higher.
Heber-Overgaard: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Taylor: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Heber-Overgaard: 11/100 · Taylor: 11/100
No gap.
Heber-Overgaard: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Taylor: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Heber-Overgaard: 36/100 · Taylor: 36/100
No gap.
Heber-Overgaard: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Taylor: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Heber-Overgaard: 4/100 · Taylor: 0/100
Heber-Overgaard is 4 points higher.
Heber-Overgaard: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Taylor: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Heber-Overgaard: 26/100 · Taylor: 4/100
Heber-Overgaard is 22 points higher.
Heber-Overgaard: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Taylor: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Heber-Overgaard: Unavailable · Taylor: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Heber-Overgaard: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Taylor: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Heber-Overgaard: 87/100 · Taylor: 49/100
Heber-Overgaard is 38 points higher.
Heber-Overgaard: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Taylor: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Heber-Overgaard: 27/100 · Taylor: 23/100
Heber-Overgaard is 4 points higher.
Heber-Overgaard: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Taylor: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.