← Back to Chandler snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Chandler vs Heber-Overgaard, AZ

Chandler currently scores 2 points higher overall than Heber-Overgaard, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Chandler

35/100

Open city page →

Heber-Overgaard

33/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Chandler: 35/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 33/100

Chandler is 2 points higher.

Flood

Chandler: 85/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 38/100

Chandler is 47 points higher.

Chandler: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Heber-Overgaard: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Chandler: 11/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 11/100

No gap.

Chandler: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Heber-Overgaard: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Chandler: 23/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 36/100

Heber-Overgaard is 13 points higher.

Chandler: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Heber-Overgaard: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Chandler: 4/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 4/100

No gap.

Chandler: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Heber-Overgaard: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Chandler: 16/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 26/100

Heber-Overgaard is 10 points higher.

Chandler: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Heber-Overgaard: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Chandler: Unavailable · Heber-Overgaard: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chandler: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Heber-Overgaard: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Chandler: 84/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 87/100

Heber-Overgaard is 3 points higher.

Chandler: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Heber-Overgaard: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Chandler: 19/100 · Heber-Overgaard: 27/100

Heber-Overgaard is 8 points higher.

Chandler: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Heber-Overgaard: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.