← Back to Haskell snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Haskell vs Perla, AR

Haskell currently scores 5 points higher overall than Perla, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Haskell

55/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Haskell: 55/100 · Perla: 50/100

Haskell is 5 points higher.

Flood

Haskell: 57/100 · Perla: 32/100

Haskell is 25 points higher.

Haskell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Perla: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Haskell: 14/100 · Perla: 14/100

No gap.

Haskell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Perla: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Haskell: 76/100 · Perla: 80/100

Perla is 4 points higher.

Haskell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Perla: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Haskell: 46/100 · Perla: 31/100

Haskell is 15 points higher.

Haskell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Perla: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Haskell: 100/100 · Perla: 100/100

No gap.

Haskell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Perla: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Haskell: Unavailable · Perla: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Haskell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Perla: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Haskell: 67/100 · Perla: 69/100

Perla is 2 points higher.

Haskell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Perla: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Haskell: 26/100 · Perla: 26/100

No gap.

Haskell: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Perla: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.