City vs city
Haskell vs Little Rock, AR
Haskell currently scores 6 points higher overall than Little Rock, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Haskell: 55/100 · Little Rock: 49/100
Haskell is 6 points higher.
Flood
Haskell: 57/100 · Little Rock: 32/100
Haskell is 25 points higher.
Haskell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Little Rock: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Haskell: 14/100 · Little Rock: 14/100
No gap.
Haskell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Little Rock: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Haskell: 76/100 · Little Rock: 78/100
Little Rock is 2 points higher.
Haskell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Little Rock: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Haskell: 46/100 · Little Rock: 35/100
Haskell is 11 points higher.
Haskell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Little Rock: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Haskell: 100/100 · Little Rock: 100/100
No gap.
Haskell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Little Rock: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Haskell: Unavailable · Little Rock: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Haskell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Little Rock: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Haskell: 67/100 · Little Rock: 57/100
Haskell is 10 points higher.
Haskell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Little Rock: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Haskell: 26/100 · Little Rock: 26/100
No gap.
Haskell: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Little Rock: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.