City vs city
Lingle vs Yoder, WY
Yoder currently scores 2 points higher overall than Lingle, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Lingle: 43/100 · Yoder: 45/100
Yoder is 2 points higher.
Flood
Lingle: 98/100 · Yoder: 79/100
Lingle is 19 points higher.
Lingle: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Yoder: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Lingle: 18/100 · Yoder: 18/100
No gap.
Lingle: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Yoder: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Lingle: 21/100 · Yoder: 22/100
Yoder is 1 points higher.
Lingle: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Yoder: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Lingle: 4/100 · Yoder: 35/100
Yoder is 31 points higher.
Lingle: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yoder: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Lingle: 100/100 · Yoder: 100/100
No gap.
Lingle: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yoder: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Lingle: Unavailable · Yoder: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Lingle: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Yoder: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Lingle: 32/100 · Yoder: 33/100
Yoder is 1 points higher.
Lingle: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Yoder: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Lingle: 27/100 · Yoder: 27/100
No gap.
Lingle: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Yoder: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.