City vs city
Grover vs Osmond, WY
Grover currently scores 5 points higher overall than Osmond, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Grover: 31/100 · Osmond: 26/100
Grover is 5 points higher.
Flood
Grover: 88/100 · Osmond: 61/100
Grover is 27 points higher.
Grover: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Osmond: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Grover: 13/100 · Osmond: 13/100
No gap.
Grover: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Osmond: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Grover: 7/100 · Osmond: 7/100
No gap.
Grover: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Osmond: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Grover: 0/100 · Osmond: 0/100
No gap.
Grover: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Osmond: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Grover: 9/100 · Osmond: 8/100
Grover is 1 points higher.
Grover: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Osmond: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Grover: Unavailable · Osmond: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Grover: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Osmond: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Grover: 52/100 · Osmond: 48/100
Grover is 4 points higher.
Grover: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Osmond: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Grover: 19/100 · Osmond: 19/100
No gap.
Grover: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Osmond: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.