City vs city
Chugwater vs Evanston, WY
Chugwater currently scores 5 points higher overall than Evanston, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Chugwater: 34/100 · Evanston: 29/100
Chugwater is 5 points higher.
Flood
Chugwater: Unavailable · Evanston: 79/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Chugwater: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Evanston: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Chugwater: 17/100 · Evanston: 12/100
Chugwater is 5 points higher.
Chugwater: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Evanston: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Chugwater: 20/100 · Evanston: 14/100
Chugwater is 6 points higher.
Chugwater: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Evanston: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Chugwater: 27/100 · Evanston: 0/100
Chugwater is 27 points higher.
Chugwater: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Evanston: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Chugwater: 100/100 · Evanston: 1/100
Chugwater is 99 points higher.
Chugwater: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Evanston: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Chugwater: Unavailable · Evanston: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Chugwater: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Evanston: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Chugwater: 48/100 · Evanston: 43/100
Chugwater is 5 points higher.
Chugwater: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Evanston: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Chugwater: 27/100 · Evanston: 26/100
Chugwater is 1 points higher.
Chugwater: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Evanston: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.