← Back to Baggs snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Baggs vs Encampment, WY

Encampment currently scores 5 points higher overall than Baggs, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Encampment

36/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Baggs: 31/100 · Encampment: 36/100

Encampment is 5 points higher.

Flood

Baggs: 98/100 · Encampment: 70/100

Baggs is 28 points higher.

Baggs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Encampment: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Baggs: 14/100 · Encampment: 15/100

Encampment is 1 points higher.

Baggs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Encampment: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Baggs: 15/100 · Encampment: 16/100

Encampment is 1 points higher.

Baggs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Encampment: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Baggs: 0/100 · Encampment: 0/100

No gap.

Baggs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Encampment: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Baggs: 3/100 · Encampment: 0/100

Baggs is 3 points higher.

Baggs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Encampment: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Baggs: Unavailable · Encampment: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Baggs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Encampment: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Baggs: 44/100 · Encampment: 44/100

No gap.

Baggs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Encampment: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Baggs: 14/100 · Encampment: 35/100

Encampment is 21 points higher.

Baggs: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Encampment: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.