City vs city
Fort Ashby vs Paw Paw, WV
Fort Ashby currently scores 10 points higher overall than Paw Paw, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Fort Ashby: 41/100 · Paw Paw: 31/100
Fort Ashby is 10 points higher.
Flood
Fort Ashby: 98/100 · Paw Paw: 67/100
Fort Ashby is 31 points higher.
Fort Ashby: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Paw Paw: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Fort Ashby: 18/100 · Paw Paw: 19/100
Paw Paw is 1 points higher.
Fort Ashby: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Paw Paw: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Fort Ashby: 17/100 · Paw Paw: 17/100
No gap.
Fort Ashby: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Paw Paw: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Fort Ashby: 0/100 · Paw Paw: 4/100
Paw Paw is 4 points higher.
Fort Ashby: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Paw Paw: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Fort Ashby: 8/100 · Paw Paw: 11/100
Paw Paw is 3 points higher.
Fort Ashby: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Paw Paw: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Fort Ashby: Unavailable · Paw Paw: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Fort Ashby: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Paw Paw: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Fort Ashby: 57/100 · Paw Paw: 57/100
No gap.
Fort Ashby: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Paw Paw: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Fort Ashby: 46/100 · Paw Paw: 42/100
Fort Ashby is 4 points higher.
Fort Ashby: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Paw Paw: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.