City vs city
Cedarburg vs Port Washington, WI
Cedarburg currently scores 19 points higher overall than Port Washington, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cedarburg: 45/100 · Port Washington: 26/100
Cedarburg is 19 points higher.
Flood
Cedarburg: 61/100 · Port Washington: 36/100
Cedarburg is 25 points higher.
Cedarburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Port Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cedarburg: 15/100 · Port Washington: 15/100
No gap.
Cedarburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cedarburg: 33/100 · Port Washington: 28/100
Cedarburg is 5 points higher.
Cedarburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cedarburg: 0/100 · Port Washington: 0/100
No gap.
Cedarburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cedarburg: 100/100 · Port Washington: 48/100
Cedarburg is 52 points higher.
Cedarburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cedarburg: Unavailable · Port Washington: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cedarburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Port Washington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cedarburg: 37/100 · Port Washington: 6/100
Cedarburg is 31 points higher.
Cedarburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Port Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Cedarburg: 22/100 · Port Washington: 22/100
No gap.
Cedarburg: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.
Port Washington: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.