← Back to Adams snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Adams vs Reedsburg, WI

Reedsburg currently scores 4 points higher overall than Adams, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Reedsburg

35/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Adams: 31/100 · Reedsburg: 35/100

Reedsburg is 4 points higher.

Flood

Adams: 49/100 · Reedsburg: 54/100

Reedsburg is 5 points higher.

Adams: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Reedsburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 14 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Adams: 15/100 · Reedsburg: 16/100

Reedsburg is 1 points higher.

Adams: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Reedsburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Adams: 14/100 · Reedsburg: 21/100

Reedsburg is 7 points higher.

Adams: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Reedsburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Adams: 15/100 · Reedsburg: 15/100

No gap.

Adams: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Reedsburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Adams: 40/100 · Reedsburg: 77/100

Reedsburg is 37 points higher.

Adams: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Reedsburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Adams: Unavailable · Reedsburg: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Adams: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Reedsburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Adams: 66/100 · Reedsburg: 46/100

Adams is 20 points higher.

Adams: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Reedsburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Adams: 18/100 · Reedsburg: 18/100

No gap.

Adams: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Reedsburg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.