City vs city
White Swan vs Yakima, WA
White Swan currently scores 6 points higher overall than Yakima, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
White Swan: 25/100 · Yakima: 19/100
White Swan is 6 points higher.
Flood
White Swan: 78/100 · Yakima: 45/100
White Swan is 33 points higher.
White Swan: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Yakima: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 13 features intersect this tile.
Wind
White Swan: 8/100 · Yakima: 8/100
No gap.
White Swan: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Yakima: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
White Swan: 1/100 · Yakima: 1/100
No gap.
White Swan: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Yakima: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
White Swan: 4/100 · Yakima: 4/100
No gap.
White Swan: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yakima: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
White Swan: 1/100 · Yakima: 5/100
Yakima is 4 points higher.
White Swan: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yakima: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
White Swan: Unavailable · Yakima: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
White Swan: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Yakima: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
White Swan: 72/100 · Yakima: 58/100
White Swan is 14 points higher.
White Swan: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Yakima: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
White Swan: 9/100 · Yakima: 9/100
No gap.
White Swan: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Yakima: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.