City vs city
Omak vs Twisp, WA
Twisp currently scores 5 points higher overall than Omak, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Omak: 12/100 · Twisp: 17/100
Twisp is 5 points higher.
Flood
Omak: Unavailable · Twisp: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Omak: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Twisp: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Omak: 10/100 · Twisp: 9/100
Omak is 1 points higher.
Omak: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Twisp: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Omak: 2/100 · Twisp: 2/100
No gap.
Omak: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Twisp: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Omak: 4/100 · Twisp: 0/100
Omak is 4 points higher.
Omak: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twisp: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Omak: 3/100 · Twisp: 3/100
No gap.
Omak: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twisp: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Omak: Unavailable · Twisp: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Omak: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Twisp: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Omak: 57/100 · Twisp: 77/100
Twisp is 20 points higher.
Omak: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Twisp: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Omak: 11/100 · Twisp: 9/100
Omak is 2 points higher.
Omak: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Twisp: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city