City vs city
Forks vs Hoquiam, WA
Forks currently scores 7 points higher overall than Hoquiam, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Forks: 17/100 · Hoquiam: 10/100
Forks is 7 points higher.
Flood
Forks: 25/100 · Hoquiam: 36/100
Hoquiam is 11 points higher.
Forks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Hoquiam: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Forks: 5/100 · Hoquiam: 5/100
No gap.
Forks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hoquiam: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Forks: 1/100 · Hoquiam: 1/100
No gap.
Forks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hoquiam: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Forks: 0/100 · Hoquiam: 0/100
No gap.
Forks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hoquiam: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Forks: 0/100 · Hoquiam: 1/100
Hoquiam is 1 points higher.
Forks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hoquiam: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Forks: Unavailable · Hoquiam: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Forks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hoquiam: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Forks: 44/100 · Hoquiam: 9/100
Forks is 35 points higher.
Forks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hoquiam: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Forks: 8/100 · Hoquiam: 8/100
No gap.
Forks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hoquiam: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city