City vs city
Camas vs Washougal, WA
Camas currently scores 6 points higher overall than Washougal, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Camas: 17/100 · Washougal: 11/100
Camas is 6 points higher.
Flood
Camas: 29/100 · Washougal: 17/100
Camas is 12 points higher.
Camas: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Washougal: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Camas: 6/100 · Washougal: 6/100
No gap.
Camas: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Washougal: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Camas: 1/100 · Washougal: 1/100
No gap.
Camas: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Washougal: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Camas: 0/100 · Washougal: 8/100
Washougal is 8 points higher.
Camas: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washougal: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Camas: 1/100 · Washougal: 3/100
Washougal is 2 points higher.
Camas: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washougal: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Camas: Unavailable · Washougal: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Camas: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Washougal: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Camas: 54/100 · Washougal: 35/100
Camas is 19 points higher.
Camas: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Washougal: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Camas: 9/100 · Washougal: 10/100
Washougal is 1 points higher.
Camas: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Washougal: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city