City vs city
Camas vs Hockinson, WA
Camas currently scores 4 points higher overall than Hockinson, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Camas: 17/100 · Hockinson: 13/100
Camas is 4 points higher.
Flood
Camas: 29/100 · Hockinson: 23/100
Camas is 6 points higher.
Camas: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Hockinson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Camas: 6/100 · Hockinson: 6/100
No gap.
Camas: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hockinson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Camas: 1/100 · Hockinson: 1/100
No gap.
Camas: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hockinson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Camas: 0/100 · Hockinson: 4/100
Hockinson is 4 points higher.
Camas: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hockinson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Camas: 1/100 · Hockinson: 8/100
Hockinson is 7 points higher.
Camas: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hockinson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Camas: Unavailable · Hockinson: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Camas: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hockinson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Camas: 54/100 · Hockinson: 41/100
Camas is 13 points higher.
Camas: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hockinson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Camas: 9/100 · Hockinson: 9/100
No gap.
Camas: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hockinson: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city