← Back to Bunk Foss snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Bunk Foss vs Snohomish, WA

Bunk Foss and Snohomish are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Bunk Foss

16/100

Open city page →

Snohomish

16/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Bunk Foss: 16/100 · Snohomish: 16/100

No gap.

Flood

Bunk Foss: 35/100 · Snohomish: 35/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Snohomish: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Bunk Foss: 7/100 · Snohomish: 7/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Snohomish: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Bunk Foss: 1/100 · Snohomish: 1/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Snohomish: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Bunk Foss: 4/100 · Snohomish: 4/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Snohomish: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Bunk Foss: 1/100 · Snohomish: 1/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Snohomish: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Bunk Foss: Unavailable · Snohomish: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Bunk Foss: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Snohomish: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Bunk Foss: 47/100 · Snohomish: 47/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Snohomish: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Bunk Foss: 14/100 · Snohomish: 14/100

No gap.

Bunk Foss: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Snohomish: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.