City vs city
Bunk Foss vs Eastmont, WA
Bunk Foss currently scores 1 points higher overall than Eastmont, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Bunk Foss: 16/100 · Eastmont: 15/100
Bunk Foss is 1 points higher.
Flood
Bunk Foss: 35/100 · Eastmont: 26/100
Bunk Foss is 9 points higher.
Bunk Foss: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Eastmont: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Bunk Foss: 7/100 · Eastmont: 7/100
No gap.
Bunk Foss: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Eastmont: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Bunk Foss: 1/100 · Eastmont: 1/100
No gap.
Bunk Foss: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Eastmont: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Bunk Foss: 4/100 · Eastmont: 0/100
Bunk Foss is 4 points higher.
Bunk Foss: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Eastmont: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Bunk Foss: 1/100 · Eastmont: 1/100
No gap.
Bunk Foss: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Eastmont: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Bunk Foss: Unavailable · Eastmont: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Bunk Foss: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Eastmont: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Bunk Foss: 47/100 · Eastmont: 43/100
Bunk Foss is 4 points higher.
Bunk Foss: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Eastmont: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Bunk Foss: 14/100 · Eastmont: 9/100
Bunk Foss is 5 points higher.
Bunk Foss: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Eastmont: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.