City vs city
Newton vs Peter, UT
Peter currently scores 3 points higher overall than Newton, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Newton: 22/100 · Peter: 25/100
Peter is 3 points higher.
Flood
Newton: 48/100 · Peter: 57/100
Peter is 9 points higher.
Newton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Peter: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Newton: 12/100 · Peter: 12/100
No gap.
Newton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Peter: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Newton: 10/100 · Peter: 10/100
No gap.
Newton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Peter: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Newton: 8/100 · Peter: 0/100
Newton is 8 points higher.
Newton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Peter: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Newton: 8/100 · Peter: 2/100
Newton is 6 points higher.
Newton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Peter: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Newton: Unavailable · Peter: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Newton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Peter: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Newton: 47/100 · Peter: 50/100
Peter is 3 points higher.
Newton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Peter: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Newton: 21/100 · Peter: 21/100
No gap.
Newton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Peter: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.