← Back to Logan snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Logan vs Peter, UT

Peter currently scores 4 points higher overall than Logan, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Logan: 21/100 · Peter: 25/100

Peter is 4 points higher.

Flood

Logan: 30/100 · Peter: 57/100

Peter is 27 points higher.

Logan: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Peter: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Logan: 12/100 · Peter: 12/100

No gap.

Logan: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Peter: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Logan: 10/100 · Peter: 10/100

No gap.

Logan: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Peter: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Logan: 4/100 · Peter: 0/100

Logan is 4 points higher.

Logan: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Peter: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Logan: 16/100 · Peter: 2/100

Logan is 14 points higher.

Logan: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Peter: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Logan: Unavailable · Peter: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Logan: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Peter: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Logan: 57/100 · Peter: 50/100

Logan is 7 points higher.

Logan: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Peter: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Logan: 21/100 · Peter: 21/100

No gap.

Logan: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Peter: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.