City vs city
Kamas vs Woodland, UT
Kamas currently scores 4 points higher overall than Woodland, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Kamas: 29/100 · Woodland: 25/100
Kamas is 4 points higher.
Flood
Kamas: 30/100 · Woodland: 30/100
No gap.
Kamas: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Woodland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Kamas: 12/100 · Woodland: 12/100
No gap.
Kamas: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Woodland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Kamas: 19/100 · Woodland: 18/100
Kamas is 1 points higher.
Kamas: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Woodland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Kamas: 0/100 · Woodland: 0/100
No gap.
Kamas: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Woodland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Kamas: 7/100 · Woodland: 1/100
Kamas is 6 points higher.
Kamas: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Woodland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Kamas: Unavailable · Woodland: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Kamas: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Woodland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Kamas: 81/100 · Woodland: 63/100
Kamas is 18 points higher.
Kamas: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Woodland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Kamas: 24/100 · Woodland: 24/100
No gap.
Kamas: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Woodland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.