City vs city
Fruit Heights vs Logan, UT
Fruit Heights currently scores 3 points higher overall than Logan, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Fruit Heights: 24/100 · Logan: 21/100
Fruit Heights is 3 points higher.
Flood
Fruit Heights: 41/100 · Logan: 30/100
Fruit Heights is 11 points higher.
Fruit Heights: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Logan: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Fruit Heights: 12/100 · Logan: 12/100
No gap.
Fruit Heights: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Logan: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Fruit Heights: 18/100 · Logan: 10/100
Fruit Heights is 8 points higher.
Fruit Heights: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Logan: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Fruit Heights: 4/100 · Logan: 4/100
No gap.
Fruit Heights: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Logan: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Fruit Heights: 9/100 · Logan: 16/100
Logan is 7 points higher.
Fruit Heights: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Logan: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Fruit Heights: Unavailable · Logan: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Fruit Heights: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Logan: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Fruit Heights: 59/100 · Logan: 57/100
Fruit Heights is 2 points higher.
Fruit Heights: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Logan: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Fruit Heights: 27/100 · Logan: 21/100
Fruit Heights is 6 points higher.
Fruit Heights: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Logan: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.