City vs city
Daniel vs Heber, UT
Daniel currently scores 1 points higher overall than Heber, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Daniel: 29/100 · Heber: 28/100
Daniel is 1 points higher.
Flood
Daniel: 43/100 · Heber: 29/100
Daniel is 14 points higher.
Daniel: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Heber: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Daniel: 12/100 · Heber: 12/100
No gap.
Daniel: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Heber: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Daniel: 18/100 · Heber: 19/100
Heber is 1 points higher.
Daniel: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Heber: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Daniel: 0/100 · Heber: 0/100
No gap.
Daniel: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Heber: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Daniel: 1/100 · Heber: 8/100
Heber is 7 points higher.
Daniel: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Heber: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Daniel: Unavailable · Heber: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Daniel: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Heber: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Daniel: 79/100 · Heber: 76/100
Daniel is 3 points higher.
Daniel: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Heber: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Daniel: 23/100 · Heber: 23/100
No gap.
Daniel: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.
Heber: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.